RadarCompare

Compare entities across multiple dimensions

Data Editor

ColorEntities / Dimensions
Formality of Design
Interface Density
Customizability
Enterprise Orientation
Self-contained Solution
Asset Centricity
Samsara
444555
Motive
444554
Geotab
355524
Verizon Connect
443453
Netradyne
332322
Lytx
342312
Nauto
221312

VisualizationTweak

Similarity Analysis

SamsaraMotiveGeotabVerizon ConnectNetradyneLytxNauto
Samsara-99.8%97.3%99.2%98.4%95.4%97.0%
Motive99.8%-97.3%99.6%98.7%95.7%96.9%
Geotab97.3%97.3%-95.7%97.9%97.9%97.0%
Verizon Connect99.2%99.6%95.7%-98.7%95.6%95.9%
Netradyne98.4%98.7%97.9%98.7%-98.8%98.4%
Lytx95.4%95.7%97.9%95.6%98.8%-97.7%
Nauto97.0%96.9%97.0%95.9%98.4%97.7%-
High (≥80%)
Medium (60-79%)
Low (<60%)
How are similarity scores calculated?

RadarCompare calculates similarity between entities using two different methods:

1. Cosine Similarity

Measures the angle between two vectors in multi-dimensional space. It focuses on the pattern of ratings rather than their magnitude.

similarity = (A·B) / (||A|| × ||B||) × 100%

Where A·B is the dot product of vectors A and B, and ||A|| is the magnitude of vector A.

2. Spearman Rank Correlation

Measures the monotonic relationship between two entities by comparing their rank orders. It captures whether entities tend to rank dimensions similarly, regardless of the actual values.

ρ = 1 - (6 × Σd²) / (n × (n² - 1)) × 100%

Where d is the difference between ranks for each dimension, and n is the number of dimensions.

3. Ordinal Distance (Gower)

Calculates the average absolute difference between scores after scaling them to the 1-5 range. It is well-suited for ordinal values.

distance = Σ|Ai - Bi| / (n × 4)

Similarity is expressed as 1 − distance, then converted to a percentage.

Interpretation:

  • 80-100%: High similarity - entities have very similar patterns
  • 60-79%: Moderate similarity - some common patterns
  • 0-59%: Low similarity - different patterns